On 06. 06. 19 1:07, Christoph wrote:
that's
very interesting! Thank you for reaching out.
Let's continue discussion on IETF DoH WG mailing list, this has impact
far beyond Knot Resolver implementation.
There doesn't appear to be any more discussion on this on
the DoH WG mailing list.
The RFC 8484 authors made their opinion rather clear.
It would be interesting to hear knot-resolver developers' opinion
so we can get an idea whether the current behavior will remain,
changes or becomes configurable.
Hi,
we have discussed this with other vendors and decided to follow suite
and ignore extra parameters in DoH GET calls.
This improvement was merged
https://gitlab.labs.nic.cz/knot/knot-resolver/merge_requests/832
and should be eventually available as part of Knot Resolver release.
In meantime we would appreaciate feedback on this change. Thank you!
--
Petr Špaček @ CZ.NIC