- knot-resolver-users - lists.nic.cz

by Ulrich Wisser

Hi, over the last weekend I did configure knot resolver on Turris Omnia to write statistics to my influxdb instance. Now that I have statistics, I am not entirely sure what all the data means. Everything under answer is easy to understand. But all data under cache is only 0, although answer.cached is not 0. Please find some stats below. I would be very grateful for some explanation what the data means. My next step would be to try to use RPZ funtionality. is there statistics for RPZ too? /Ulrich > stats.list() [answer.nxdomain] => 360546 [answer.100ms] => 64682 [answer.1500ms] => 2740 [answer.slow] => 12137 [answer.servfail] => 204137 [answer.250ms] => 84208 [answer.cached] => 430091 [answer.nodata] => 1533 [answer.1ms] => 462921 [answer.total] => 922236 [answer.10ms] => 58963 [answer.noerror] => 356015 [answer.50ms] => 195917 [answer.500ms] => 29794 [answer.1000ms] => 7525 [predict.learned] => 54 [predict.epoch] => 19 [predict.queue] => 520 [query.edns] => 152223 [query.dnssec] => 211 > cache.stats() [hit] => 0 [delete] => 0 [miss] => 0 [insert] => 0 -- Ulrich Wisser ulrich(a)wisser.se

7 let, 6 měsíců

2
5
0 0

Running systemd service and binding to privileged ports

by Ondrej Vaško

Hello knot-resolver users, I have a question about design of systemd service for knot-resolver. I installed knot from repository OpenSuse repository <https://software.opensuse.org//download.html?project=home%3ACZ-NIC%3Aknot-r…> on Ubuntu 16 and 18. The systemd service uses user *knot-resolver*. But this user cannot bind to unprivileged ports, so when I have configuration like below where I bind to network interface on privileged port and change user context, it fails with "*[system] bind to '10.20.30.118@853' Permission denied*": ``` net.listen({'10.20.30.118'}, 853, { tls = true }) user('knot-resolver', 'knot-resolver') ``` To fix this I changed User *knot-resolver* to *root* in systemd service. Now service starts to run as root, binds to network interface and then changes context. My question is, is this solution security wise fine? Why is the systemd service designed to run as user knot-resolver, when I guess many people will need to override this in order to use knot-resolver properly? What is the main idea? Or is there a different approach to overcome this (Such as linux capabilities)? Thank you for responses and please correct me in anything if I am wrong. Ondrej Vaško

7 let, 6 měsíců

2
1
0 0

Modifying policy rules of a running resolver instance

by Martin Sehnoutka

Hi, I would like to run Knot Resolver with DNS-over-TLS on my laptop, but I need to configure 'policy.FORWARD' whenever I connect to our corporate network. The information about new connection is provided by the Network Manager, that is not a problem, but then I need to configure the resolver somehow. I was thinking about creating a new configuration file and simply restarting the server, but it fails with "Start request repeated too quickly". Is there a way to add/remove policy rules "on the fly"? The HTTP/2 module seems like a good candidate for doing this. Can this module be used to accomplish this task? Best regards, Martin Sehnoutka PS: If there is anyone using dnssec-trigger, this would be similar, but less complicated. -- Martin Sehnoutka | Associate Software Engineer PGP: 5FD64AF5 UTC+1 (CET) RED HAT | TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED.

7 let, 6 měsíců

3
7
0 0

How to use forwarding when recursion is failed?

by Ilya Evseev

Hi, Folks! I want to use GoogleDNS 8.8.x.x as fallback forwarder when domain's NS'es are down or inaccessible (for example, when network connectivity between me and NS is broken). Is it possible? policy.add(policy.all(policy.FORWARD({ '8.8.8.8', '8.8.4.4' }))) works well, but disables recursion at all. How to call it only after/when recursion is failed? WBR, Ilya

7 let, 6 měsíců

1
0
0 0

Knot Resolver 2.3.0

by Tomas Krizek

Dear Knot Resolver users, Knot Resolver 2.3.0 has been released. This is a security release that fixes CVE-2018-1110. We're also introducing a new mailing list, knot-resolver-announce. Only notifications about new releases or important announcements will be posted there. https://lists.nic.cz/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/knot-resolver-announce Security -------- - fix CVE-2018-1110: denial of service triggered by malformed DNS messages (!550, !558, security!2, security!4) - increase resilience against slow lorris attack (security!5) Bugfixes -------- - validation: fix SERVFAIL in case of CNAME to NXDOMAIN in a single zone (!538) - validation: fix SERVFAIL for DS . query (!544) - lib/resolve: don't send unecessary queries to parent zone (!513) - iterate: fix validation for zones where parent and child share NS (!543) - TLS: improve error handling and documentation (!536, !555, !559) Improvements ------------ - prefill: new module to periodically import root zone into cache (replacement for RFC 7706, !511) - network_listen_fd: always create end point for supervisor supplied file descriptor - use CPPFLAGS build environment variable if set (!547) Full changelog: https://gitlab.labs.nic.cz/knot/knot-resolver/raw/v2.3.0/NEWS Sources: https://secure.nic.cz/files/knot-resolver/knot-resolver-2.3.0.tar.xz GPG signature: https://secure.nic.cz/files/knot-resolver/knot-resolver-2.3.0.tar.xz.asc Documentation: https://knot-resolver.readthedocs.io/en/v2.3.0/ -- Tomas Krizek PGP: 4A8B A48C 2AED 933B D495 C509 A1FB A5F7 EF8C 4869

7 let, 8 měsíců

1
0
0 0

RPM packaging issues

by Martin Sehnoutka

Hi, I have a fresh installation of the Knot Resolver on my Fedora 27: *Package version*: $ rpm -q knot-resolver knot-resolver-2.2.0-1.fc27.x86_64 but it does not work out of the box. The problem is, that the user "knot-resolver" cannot bind to a privileged port. Why is the systemd service file using knot-resolver user? It works just fine, when I remove the "User=" option from service file and add this line into the kres.conf file: user('knot-resolver', 'knot-resolver') The resulting process runs as knot-resolver and it binds successfully. Best regards, -- Martin Sehnoutka | Associate Software Engineer PGP: 5FD64AF5 UTC+1 (CET) RED HAT | TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED.

7 let, 8 měsíců

2
3
0 0

Knot Resolver 2.2.0

by Tomas Krizek

Dear Knot Resolver users, Knot Resolver 2.2.0 has been released. New features ------------ - cache server unavailability to prevent flooding unreachable servers (Please note that caching algorithm needs further optimization and will change in further versions but we need to gather operational experience first.) Bugfixes -------- - don't magically -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 in some cases - allow large responses for outbound over TCP - fix crash with RR sets with over 255 records Full changelog: https://gitlab.labs.nic.cz/knot/knot-resolver/raw/v2.2.0/NEWS Sources: https://secure.nic.cz/files/knot-resolver/knot-resolver-2.2.0.tar.xz GPG signature: https://secure.nic.cz/files/knot-resolver/knot-resolver-2.2.0.tar.xz.asc Documentation: https://knot-resolver.readthedocs.io/en/v2.2.0/ -- Tomas Krizek PGP: 4A8B A48C 2AED 933B D495 C509 A1FB A5F7 EF8C 4869

7 let, 8 měsíců

2
1
0 0

How to disable DNSSEC validation for specific domains

by Leonardo Brondani Schenkel

Hello, There is a website I need to use in a daily basis that uses DNSSEC, however their keys have expired which causes validation to fail. I have contacted their support but they failed to resolve the issue so far. Since I can resolve the name when using `dig +cd`, I was hoping I could configure `kresd` to skip validation when resolving that specific domain. It seems that I should be able to do so by using the `policies` module and the `FLAGS` action: https://knot-resolver.readthedocs.io/en/stable/modules.html#actions I am not sure with flag/flags to use. I inspected the source and tried the following: policy.add(policy.suffix(policy.FLAGS('DNSSEC_CD'),{todname('example.org.')})) But this apparently had no effect. I also tried without the trailing dot and played with other flags, but no success. Does anybody know which flag I could set to bypass DNSSEC validation for the specified domain? Or, if the policy module is not the way to achieve that goal, is there any other way? # kresd --version Knot DNS Resolver, version 1.5.1 Any help will be greatly appreciated, // Leonardo.

7 let, 9 měsíců

2
2
0 0

Can't build 2.1 on Ubuntu 16.04.4 LTS

by Paul Hoffman

Greetings. I want to build Knot 2.1 on a Ubuntu 16.04.4 LTS. However, the libknot from the packages is too old: Makefile:87: *** libknot >= 2.6.4 required. Stop. As compared to: libknot-dev/xenial,now 2.1.1-1build1 amd64 [installed] Is it possible to get the libknot package on Ubuntu 16.04.4 LTS updated soon? If not, how do I install the latest libknot by hand? --Paul Hoffman

7 let, 9 měsíců

4
6
0 0

Unsure on the kskroll-sentinel handling

by Paul Hoffman

Greetings. My kresd config file is: net.listen('192.241.207.161', 5364) trust_anchors.file = 'root.keys' modules.load('ta_sentinel') I wanted to test this with a zone I set up at this-is-signed.com. However, I'm getting a positive result back for both the is-ta and the not-ta records (it is properly giving me the SERVFAIL for the bogus record). Have I configured Knot Resolver incorrectly? For Knot 2.2.1, do I need a different form for the names in order to get the kskroll-sentinel effect to kick in? From the DNSOP WG mailing list traffic, I thought I needed the 4f66 tag, but could have misinterpreted that. --Paul Hoffman # dig @192.241.207.161 -p 5364 kskroll-sentinel-is-ta-4f66.this-is-signed.com a ; <<>> DiG 9.10.3-P4-Ubuntu <<>> @192.241.207.161 -p 5364 kskroll-sentinel-is-ta-4f66.this-is-signed.com a ; (1 server found) ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 36153 ;; flags: qr rd ra ad; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1 ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION: ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;kskroll-sentinel-is-ta-4f66.this-is-signed.com. IN A ;; ANSWER SECTION: kskroll-sentinel-is-ta-4f66.this-is-signed.com. 60 IN CNAME this-is-signed.com. this-is-signed.com. 60 IN A 192.241.207.161 ;; Query time: 283 msec ;; SERVER: 192.241.207.161#5364(192.241.207.161) ;; WHEN: Sun Feb 25 00:09:54 UTC 2018 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 105 # dig @192.241.207.161 -p 5364 kskroll-sentinel-not-ta-4f66.this-is-signed.com a ; <<>> DiG 9.10.3-P4-Ubuntu <<>> @192.241.207.161 -p 5364 kskroll-sentinel-not-ta-4f66.this-is-signed.com a ; (1 server found) ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 14466 ;; flags: qr rd ra ad; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1 ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION: ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;kskroll-sentinel-not-ta-4f66.this-is-signed.com. IN A ;; ANSWER SECTION: kskroll-sentinel-not-ta-4f66.this-is-signed.com. 60 IN CNAME this-is-signed.com. this-is-signed.com. 54 IN A 192.241.207.161 ;; Query time: 5 msec ;; SERVER: 192.241.207.161#5364(192.241.207.161) ;; WHEN: Sun Feb 25 00:10:00 UTC 2018 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 106 # dig @192.241.207.161 -p 5364 bogus.this-is-signed.com a ; <<>> DiG 9.10.3-P4-Ubuntu <<>> @192.241.207.161 -p 5364 bogus.this-is-signed.com a ; (1 server found) ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 20810 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;bogus.this-is-signed.com. IN A ;; Query time: 9 msec ;; SERVER: 192.241.207.161#5364(192.241.207.161) ;; WHEN: Sun Feb 25 00:10:08 UTC 2018 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 42

7 let, 9 měsíců

2
2
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

knot-resolver-users