- knot-resolver-users - lists.nic.cz

by Vladimír Čunát

On 24/09/2021 14.29, Günther J. Niederwimmer wrote: > I mean my cert and key are are equipped with "standard" rights ? > > Knot-resolver can't handle it ? It does not run under "root" user or group (by default), so in your settings it won't be able to read them. --Vladimir

3 roky, 11 měsíců

1
0
0 0

Issuing multiple recursive queries

by Elipsion

Hi, I'm having trouble reading the documentation for Lua modules, is it possible to issue multiple recursive queries and await all of the results? What I'm trying to achieve is a CNAME glue-zone, d.example.com, that searches in several other zones (phy.example.com, vm.example.com, ad.example.com, etc) and returns a CNAME record into the one with the highest priority (configurable, probably just a list) that does not reply with a NXDOMAIN. I'd like to do all the recursions in parallel, to keep users as happy as possible. Configuration might look something like this: local zones = { ["d.example.com"] = { "phy.example.com", "vm.example.com", "ad.example.com" }, ["vm.example.com"] = { "vmware.vm.example.com", "hyperv.vm.example.com" } } /Erik () ascii ribbon - against html e-mail /\ arc.pasp.de - against proprietary attachments

4 roky

2
4
0 0

Does KNOT RESOLVER support DNS ANY queries?

by Michal Jerabek

Hello, it seems that Knot Resolver doesn't responde for DNS ANY queries or it does? Unable to found how to set it up in documentaction. Thank you for you help Michal

4 roky

2
1
0 0

Does KNOT RESOLVER support DNS ANY queries?

by Michal Jerabek

Hello, it seems that Knot Resolver doesn't responde for DNS ANY queries or it does? Unable to found how to set it up in documentaction. Thank you for your help Michal

4 roky

1
0
0 0

Knot Resolver 5.4.1

by Tomas Krizek

Dear Knot Resolver users, Knot Resolver 5.4.1 has been released! Improvements ------------ - docker: base image on Debian 11 (!1203) Bugfixes -------- - fix build without doh2 support after 5.4.0 (!1197) - fix policy.DEBUG* logging and -V/--version after 5.4.0 (!1199) - doh2: ensure memory from unsent streams is freed (!1202) Full changelog: https://gitlab.nic.cz/knot/knot-resolver/raw/v5.4.1/NEWS Sources: https://secure.nic.cz/files/knot-resolver/knot-resolver-5.4.1.tar.xz GPG signature: https://secure.nic.cz/files/knot-resolver/knot-resolver-5.4.1.tar.xz.asc Documentation: https://knot-resolver.readthedocs.io/en/v5.4.1/ -- Tomas Krizek PGP: 4A8B A48C 2AED 933B D495 C509 A1FB A5F7 EF8C 4869

4 roky

1
0
0 0

Knot Resolver 5.4.0

by Tomas Krizek

Dear Knot Resolver users, Knot Resolver 5.4.0 has been released! It comes with improved logging facilities and new debugging options. Improvements ------------ - fine grained logging and syslog support (!1181) - expose HTTP headers for processing DoH requests (!1165) - improve assertion mechanism for debugging (!1146) - support apkg tool for packaging workflow (!1178) - support Knot DNS 3.1 (!1192, !1194) Bugfixes -------- - trust_anchors.set_insecure: improve precision (#673, !1177) - plug memory leaks related to TCP (!1182) - policy.FLAGS: fix not applying properly in edge cases (!1179) - fix a crash with older libuv inside timer processing (!1195) Incompatible changes -------------------- - see upgrading guide: https://knot-resolver.readthedocs.io/en/stable/upgrading.html#to-5-4 - legacy DoH implementation configuration in net.listen() was renamed from kind="doh" to kind="doh_legacy" (!1180) Full changelog: https://gitlab.nic.cz/knot/knot-resolver/raw/v5.4.0/NEWS Sources: https://secure.nic.cz/files/knot-resolver/knot-resolver-5.4.0.tar.xz GPG signature: https://secure.nic.cz/files/knot-resolver/knot-resolver-5.4.0.tar.xz.asc Documentation: https://knot-resolver.readthedocs.io/en/v5.4.0/ -- Tomas Krizek PGP: 4A8B A48C 2AED 933B D495 C509 A1FB A5F7 EF8C 4869

4 roky, 1 měsíc

1
0
0 0

Plans for FreeBSD support?

by Chris

Hello all, I've recently switched from the unbound resolver to the knot resolver for all outgoing name resolution on one of my FreeBSD servers. It all works pretty much as expected. With one problem; initializing and terminating kresd isn't possible w/o adding some external scripting. Given that the BSDs don't come w/systemd. Are there any plans to better support the sysv init system in the knot resolver? Thanks in advance for any hints/pointers/solutions. :-) --Chris

4 roky, 3 měsíce

2
2
0 0

Knot Resolver 5.3.2

by Tomas Krizek

Dear Knot Resolver users, Knot Resolver 5.3.2 has been released! Security -------- - validator: fix 5.3.1 regression on over-limit NSEC3 edge case (!1169) Assertion might be triggered by query/answer, potentially DoS. Improvements ------------ - cache: improve handling write errors from LMDB (!1159) - doh2: improve handling of stream errors (!1164) Bugfixes -------- - dnstap module: fix repeated configuration (!1168) - validator: fix SERVFAIL for some rare dynamic proofs (!1166) - fix SIGBUS on uncommon ARM machines (unaligned access; !1167, #426) - cache: better resilience on abnormal termination/restarts (!1172) - doh2: fix memleak on stream write failures (!1161) Full changelog: https://gitlab.nic.cz/knot/knot-resolver/raw/v5.3.2/NEWS Sources: https://secure.nic.cz/files/knot-resolver/knot-resolver-5.3.2.tar.xz GPG signature: https://secure.nic.cz/files/knot-resolver/knot-resolver-5.3.2.tar.xz.asc Documentation: https://knot-resolver.readthedocs.io/en/v5.3.2/ -- Tomas Krizek PGP: 4A8B A48C 2AED 933B D495 C509 A1FB A5F7 EF8C 4869

4 roky, 4 měsíce

1
0
0 0

Disable qname minimization

by Bjoern Franke

Hi, I recently stumbled about the following issue with postfix: DANE TLSA lookup problem: Host or domain name not found. Name service error for name=_25._tcp.smtp-relay-in-s1.neusta.de type=TLSA: Host not found, try again Postfix uses knot-resolver and I found [1] as a possible similar issue with unbound. I would like to test if the issue persists with disabled qname minimization, but it seems to be no configurale option. Kind Regards Bjoern [1] http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/Mail-deferred-TLSA-lookup-error-td1074…

4 roky, 4 měsíce

2
3
0 0

Writing a module to forward a query to another nameserver if recursive resolution fails

by Paul Furtado

Hello, We operate recursive resolvers in our network in AWS and from within the AWS network there are certain authoritative nameservers that block large swaths of the AWS IP range, causing resolution to fail for us. So I'm attempting to write a module that will handle failures reaching external resolvers and retry the query by forwarding it to a major resolver like cloudflare DNS. We push a ton of DNS query traffic so we do not want to simply forward to a public resolver, we only want to forward if recursion doesn't work for some reason. I've poured through the documentation and source code and tried to hook a variety of places, but I can't seem to find a good spot to hook the request failure. The finish layer allows me to hook the SERVFAIL, but by then it is too late to do anything. Using a simple policy, I was actually able to do something close by calling ensure_answer(), clearing the answer, setting the same forwarding flags as the forward policy, and then calling ensure_answer() again and I could see the query getting sent to cloudflare, so it seems like this is possible, but at the policy level it's too early to know if a query will result in a SERVFAIL. Could anyone point me in the right direction here? Thank you! Paul

4 roky, 4 měsíce

2
3
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

knot-resolver-users