Hi Anand!
Yay!! Thank you very much for this release. My
experiences with it so
You are very welcome. :-) We are also glad that the release is finally out.
1. It builds properly under CentOS 6, with the caveat
that one has to
find "gnutls3" and "nettle" packages from somewhere, because
they're
not in EPEL 6. For the time being, I'm using packages from:
https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/jvcelak/gnutls3/
It would be good if gnutls were officially added to EPEL 6.
I need to say that the gnutls3 package in COPR is a based on some at that time
up-to-date Fedora 21 package. But it is not maintained. It might contain some
bugs (security?). I really don't know.
I'm working on getting the gnutls3 package in official EPEL repositories.
Please, give me a few days (weeks?).
3. I really, really like the template concept :)
I really love to hear that. So simple and so powerful! :-) I like it as well.
6. I'm trying to figure out whether RPM can tell
me it's upgrading
from 1.x to 2.x, so that I can trigger the knot1to2 utility on 1.x
config files. But I don't yet know how to get this info from RPM.
I was also wondering about this. It's probably not possible because the RPM
allows installation of multiple packages with the same name (e.g., kernel and
multilib packages). It won't tell you which package is being replaced.
The only sane way which comes to my mind is to call "knotc checkconf".
7. Talking about the knot1to2 utility, I have a
suggestion. ...
... Is it too late to change this behaviour?
It's never late!
Regards,
Jan