Re: [knot-dns-users] zone delagation format?

Hello Daniel, is any chance to achieve this behavior in the superior zone 0.10.in-addr.arpa

or I have to always create zone 0.0.10.in-addr.arpa on my server with listed records? I hoped for something more automated. Because I just want to delegate the class to another server, it seems to be a huge adjustment in the case of another subnet/class ( /25 or /26 ). Best regards, Milan ---------- Původní e-mail ---------- Od: daniel.salzman(a)nic.cz Komu: Milan Sýkora <sykora.milan01(a)seznam.cz> Datum: 3. 11. 2018 18:07:41 Předmět: Re: [knot-dns-users] zone delagation format? > Hello Milan, > > I guess you have something like: > > zone 0.0.10.in-addr.arpa. > ------------------------- > ... > 104/29 NS my.test.server. > 104 CNAME 104.104/29 > ... > 111 CNAME 111.104/29 > > zone 104/29.0.0.10.in-addr.arpa. > -------------------------------- > ... > 104 PTR ... > ... > 111 PTR ... > > However, you should ask a resolver (not the authoritative server) to > get > an expected response because of the delegation. > > Daniel > > On 2018-11-02 11:07, Milan Sýkora wrote: >> Hello, >> >> could you please send me a short guide how to delegate a zone > subnet >> (class) to different NS. >> >> I have a zone i.e. 0.10.in-addr.arpa.zone >> >> where I would like to delegate a part of the zone 10.0.0.104/29 >> (255.255.255.248) to different NS. It includes 8 IP addresses >> (10.0.0.104, 10.0.0.105, 10.0.0.106 .... 10.0.0.111) >> then I create a record in the mentioned zone like >> >> 104/29.0.0.10.in-addr.arpa. 300 NS my.test.server. >> >> I tried to understand the syntax in RFC 2317 >> (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2317) but it seems to be wrongly >> implemented from my side. >> >> When I tried to "dig" records I have to ask next IP address in the > row >> not like dig -x 10.0.0.105 bud like dig -x 10.0.0.104/29.105 >> >> Many thanks for the clarification, >> best regards >> Milan.