Hi. Thank for the reply. Sorry for
being on the wrong list.
We're on FreeBSD. Migrating to ports/dns/knot3 (knot 3.0.4)
from knot 2.6.5.
Thanks again!
--Chris
Daniel
On 4/9/21 8:30 AM, libor.peltan wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> first of all, you seem to be talking about Knot DNS, so it's proper to
> switch to correct mailing list, instead of Knot Resolver's one.
>
> I assume you have read all the single-version migration guides below
>
https://www.knot-dns.cz/docs/3.0/singlehtml/index.html#upgrade-2-6-x-to-2-7…
> . It's clear that when migrating over multiple
> versions, you need to take care about all the notes at once.
>
> What databases exactly are you talking about? Knot DNS uses multiple
> databases for different purposes, e.g. journal or KASP DB. The good news
> is, their format does not change much, and when it does,
> it's usually backwards-compatible, with some exceptions.
>
> I would strongly recommend that you clone your environment, perform the
> migration in some "playground" setup first, and observe if everything went
> well; all before migration your production setup ;)
> Should you encounter any issues, please contact us on our mailing-list.
>
> Anyway, you might consider a multi-step migration, so that you would
> migrate by just one (major) version at once, like this: 2.6.5 -> 2.7.8 ->
> 2.8.5 -> 2.9.9 -> 3.0.5.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Libor
>
> Dne 09. 04. 21 v 8:13 Daniel Salzman napsal(a):
>>
>>
>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>> Subject: [knot-resolver-users] Any "gothcas" going from 2.65 to 3.04 I
>> should know about?
>> Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2021 23:03:54 -0700
>> From: Chris <knot(a)tacomawireless.net>
>> Reply-To: Knot Resolver Users List <knot-resolver-users(a)lists.nic.cz>
>> To: knot-resolver-users <knot-resolver-users(a)lists.nic.cz>
>>
>> Hi. Moving a couple of our servers to new hardware, and
>> taking that opportunity to upgrade some of the services
>> at the same time. The main one being knot. Moving from
>> a 2.65 context to 3.04. I've read the upgrade doc, and
>> while there isn't a 2.65 --> 3.04. It appears for our
>> environment that the changed/removed stanzas won't
>> have much of an impact *except* as they relate to the
>> database. That is; it appears that it isn't going to
>> be a smooth transition, as they appear to be incompatible.
>> Is that right? Do I need to rewrite all the keys &&
>> serials, and start from scratch? If so, as we have
>> a huge number of domains, this will be an enormous task.
>> Is this avoidable?
>>
>> Thank you for any and all insight into this transition.
>>
>> --Chris