Ah, sorry, I didn't get that before. We might add that to our todo list and add it to some future version. Anyway is the overhead through local syslog that big?

Ondřej Surý

On 9. 3. 2013, at 21:18, <jh@netriplex.com> wrote:

Thanks,

 

I was looking for the ability to send directly and not to have the local syslog daemon forward/relay it. But we can do that.

 

Jonathan

 

From: Ondřej Surý [mailto:ondrej.sury@nic.cz]
Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2013 2:34 PM
To: <jh@netriplex.com>
Cc: <knot-dns-users@lists.nic.cz>
Subject: Re: [knot-dns-users] syslog server?

 

Hi Jonathan,

 

syslog is already there, see the full knot.conf sample: https://redmine.labs.nic.cz/projects/knot-dns/repository/revisions/master/entry/samples/knot.full.conf

 

Or example in the user manual:

 

https://jenkins.labs.nic.cz/job/Knot%20DNS/Slaves=Debian-6-64b/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/doc/knot.html/log-Example.html#log-Example

Ondřej Surý


On 9. 3. 2013, at 14:59, <jh@netriplex.com> wrote:

Hello,

Is there any plan to add the ability to allow logging to a syslog server vs.
a log file?

Regards,

Jonathan



_______________________________________________
knot-dns-users mailing list
knot-dns-users@lists.nic.cz
https://lists.nic.cz/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/knot-dns-users