26 Čen
2017
26 Čen
'17
12:36
On 06/26/2017 12:23 PM, Leo Vandewoestijne wrote:
So before I continue in making a meta-port or the
knot2 port, just for the sake of libknot,
I'm wondering;
wouldn't other OS'es packaging systems not benefit from having libknot seperate
from knot?
The typical setup in (Linux) distros is to have one source package for
all knot-dns stuff producing multiple binary packages, e.g. libknot and
libdnssec are typically in binary package(s) of their own. I personally
don't think any further splitting would be good.
--Vladimir