knot-dns-users

knot-dns-users@lists.nic.cz

6 participants
762 discussions

konvert Knot DNS sigantures certs to BIND format.

by Milan Jeskynka Kazatel

Hello community, can I somehow convert stored certificates for a signed zone to BIND format? My use case is to change used topology for authoritative servers. I´m manage existing zones in Knot, now I would like to transfer it to BIND and use existing certificates for signing it on BIND due to DS records in parent zones. The knot will be reconfigured as a slave. Is it possible to achieve it? Thanks. -- Smil Milan Jeskyňka Kazatel

7 let, 3 měsíce

why is kdig different to dig?

by Arsen STASIC

Hi, I'm not sure if it was already discussed on this list. Why is BIND's dig getting a AD flag and kdig not? Obviously sends dig the AD flag by default, but why have you decided this way? dig +noall +comments @dotns1.aco.net univie.ac.at soa +qr ;; Sending: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 52963 ;; flags: rd ad; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1 ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION: ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096 ; COOKIE: d2171ad4016ceb3d ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 52963 ;; flags: qr rd ra ad; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1 ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION: ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096 kdig +noall +header @dotns1.aco.net univie.ac.at soa +qr ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY; status: NOERROR; id: 25583 ;; Flags: rd; QUERY: 1; ANSWER: 0; AUTHORITY: 0; ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY; status: NOERROR; id: 25583 ;; Flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1; ANSWER: 1; AUTHORITY: 0; ADDITIONAL: 0 cheers, -arsen

7 let, 3 měsíce

Re: [knot-dns-users] knot have chroot or setuid features?

by Daniel Salzman

Hi, Knot DNS doesn't call chroot. As for setuid, look at the source https://gitlab.labs.nic.cz/knot/knot-dns/blob/master/src/knot/common/proces… Another interesting feature is https://gitlab.labs.nic.cz/knot/knot-dns/merge_requests/864 Daniel On 2/21/19 9:50 AM, Champion Xie wrote: > > > -- > Best Regards!! > champion_xie

7 let, 3 měsíce

DNSSEC On-slave signing

by Milan Jeskynka Kazatel

Hello, community, could someone more describe the On-slave signing on both sides - slave and master in the case where the master server runs on bind and slave is Knot DNS? I would like to achieve signing for "hidden master" configuration. I found in Knot DNS documentation: *** It is possible to enable automatic DNSSEC zone signing even on a slave server. If enabled, the zone is signed after every AXFR/IXFR transfer from master, so that the slave always serves a signed up-to-date version of the zone. It is strongly recommended to block any outside access to the master server, so that only the slave’s signed version of the zone is served. Enabled on-slave signing introduces events when the slave zone changes while the master zone remains unchanged, such as a key rollover or refreshing of RRSIG records, which cause inequality of zone SOA serial between master and slave. The slave server handles this by saving the master’s SOA serial in a special variable inside KASP DB and appropriately modifiying AXFR/IXFR queries/answers to keep the communication with master consistent while applying the changes with a different serial. It is recommended to use UNIX time serial policy on master and incremental serial policy on slave so that their SOA serials are equal most of the time. *** Thanks for any advice. Regards, kaza

7 let, 4 měsíce

Migration from djbdns/tinydns to knot-dns.cz

by Frank Matthieß

Hello all, we want to migrate to a state of the art nameserver software. Our startingpoint is djbdns/tinydns. Our first step should be to to use zone transfer from tinydns to knot-dns (2.7.6). I configure the knot-dns a slave: # knotc conf-read … acl.id = master acl[master].address = 5.28.40.220 acl[master].action = notify remote.id = master remote[master].address = 5.28.40.220 … zone.domain = vtnx.net. zone[vtnx.net.].master = master zone[vtnx.net.].acl = master and add a initial soa rr for that domain: vtnx.net. 0 SOA ns1.vtnx.net. hostmaster.vtnx.net. 1 16384 2048 1048576 2560 This the exact soa of the running vtnx.net domain, but a diffrent serial. After triggering the notification from the master, i got this logging: Jan 24 07:53:19 ns1-neu knotd[26299]: info: [vtnx.net.] notify, incoming, 5.28.40.220@38668: received, serial none Jan 24 07:53:19 ns1-neu knotd[26299]: info: [vtnx.net.] refresh, outgoing, 5.28.40.220@53: remote serial 1548307450, zone is outdated Jan 24 07:53:19 ns1-neu knotd[26299]: warning: [vtnx.net.] IXFR, incoming, 5.28.40.220@53: malformed response SOA Jan 24 07:53:19 ns1-neu knotd[26299]: warning: [vtnx.net.] refresh, remote master not usable Jan 24 07:53:19 ns1-neu knotd[26299]: error: [vtnx.net.] refresh, failed (no usable master) What about "malformed response SOA"? Why is this an IXFR and no AXFR? - Frank -- Frank Matthieß Mail: frank.matthiess(a)virtion.de GnuPG: 9F81 BD57 C898 6059 86AA 0E9B 6B23 DE93 01BB 63D1 virtion GmbH Stapenhorster Straße 42b, DE 33615 Bielefeld Geschäftsführer: Michael Kutzner Handelsregister HRB 40374, Amtsgericht Bielefeld, USt-IdNr.: DE278312983

7 let, 4 měsíce

Knot DNS 2.7.6 release

by Daniel Salzman

Hello Knot DNS users, CZ.NIC has released Knot DNS 2.7.6! This version mainly fixes a very old bug relating pending zone events upon server reload or configuration commit. If you don't use zone journal, please check if it exists and possibly drop it. It can be a consequence of a small regression introduced in the previous version. I'm sorry for that! Changelog: https://gitlab.labs.nic.cz/knot/knot-dns/tags/v2.7.6 Source code: https://secure.nic.cz/files/knot-dns/knot-2.7.6.tar.xz https://secure.nic.cz/files/knot-dns/knot-2.7.6.tar.xz.asc Documentation: https://www.knot-dns.cz/docs/2.7/html Support: https://www.knot-dns.cz/support Regards, Daniel

7 let, 4 měsíce

zonefile-load: difference

by Volker Janzen

Hi, I want to use Ansible to deploy zone files to my Knot signer (hidden master). The zone files should be generated from the Ansible playbook data and will not contain any DNSSEC related information, just SOA, NS, A, AAAA, TXT and MX records. I'd like to use Knot DNSSEC auto-signing. I can stop the Knot process before deploying new zone files. I use zonefile-load: difference in this case, as of the DNSKEY / CDNSKEY / CDS data should not be replaced with something new. Should this work for me, or is there anything I miss or is there even a better option? Kind regards, Volker

7 let, 5 měsíců

Knot DNS 2.7.5 release

by Daniel Salzman

Hello Knot DNS users, CZ.NIC has released Knot DNS 2.7.5! Changelog: https://gitlab.labs.nic.cz/knot/knot-dns/tags/v2.7.5 Source code: https://secure.nic.cz/files/knot-dns/knot-2.7.5.tar.xz https://secure.nic.cz/files/knot-dns/knot-2.7.5.tar.xz.asc Documentation: https://www.knot-dns.cz/docs/2.7/html Support: https://www.knot-dns.cz/support Regards, Daniel

7 let, 5 měsíců

knot group in a FreeBSD jail -- Permission Denied to Knotc and Python API

by Rick van Rein

Hi, I'm working on a registry for +31 ENUM, using Knot DNS 2.6.8. The intention is to trigger the Python API from PostgreSQL database views. The postgres user, though added to the knot group and granted rw- on all of /var/db/knot/* and the knotd socket, cannot do thinkgs like conf-read through the Python API or knotc. This is where root and the postgres user diverge: 84630 knotc CALL open(0x7fffffffe100,0x100022<O_RDWR|O_EXLOCK|O_CLOEXEC>) 84630 knotc NAMI "/tmp/SEMDMDBrXFzK!_#un)" 84630 knotc RET open 6 84630 knotc CALL fstat(0x6,0x7fffffffe068) 84630 knotc STRU struct stat {dev=4261341516, ino=125942, mode=0100660, nlink=1, uid=0, gid=0, rdev=4294967295, atime=1545172776.416579000, mtime=1545182138.348328000, ctime=1545182138.348328000, birthtime=1545172776.416478000, size=16, blksize=4096, blocks=2, flags=0x800 } That's root. uid=0 and gid=0 for the /tmp/SENDMDB... file. But now: 84649 knotc CALL open(0x7fffffffe0f0,0x100022<O_RDWR|O_EXLOCK|O_CLOEXEC>) 84649 knotc NAMI "/tmp/SEMDMDBrXFzK!_#un)" 84649 knotc RET open -1 errno 13 Permission denied That's user postgres, even though it is in the knot group. It seems to see the file but have no access, probably due to uid=0, gid=0. Note that matching name. --> What is this file it is trying to open, and is it always mapped to uid=0,gid=0, even if the user running "knotc conf-read" is not root? Could this be a FreeBSD things, or a jail thing? Any advise is welcome! Thanks! -Rick

7 let, 5 měsíců

Re: [knot-dns-users] knot group in a FreeBSD jail -- Permission Denied to Knotc and Python API

by Daniel Salzman

I don't think the Makefile is wrong. If you call knotc with an explicit control socket specification, no configuration file is loaded because it's not needed. So there is an issue with the configuration access. But I don't understand why knotd is not affected? You could also test using configuration database. Daniel On 12/21/18 2:44 PM, Rick van Rein wrote: > Hi Daniel, > >> I guess it relates to a temporary confdb, which is created for storing configuration loaded from >> a config file and removed upon. Could you try calling knotc with explicit socket parameter (knotc -s ...)? > > Yes, that solved it. > > The default socket path is @run_dir@/knot.sock, and the ports tree > configures --with-rundir=/var/run/knot but, according to > https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-ports/blob/master/dns/knot2/Makefile#L32… > it is under defined variables. I will ask Leo if this might need > correction. > > Thanks! > -Rick >

7 let, 6 měsíců

← Newer
1
...
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
...
77
Older →

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

knot-dns-users