SOLVED. See below.
On Sat, 27 Aug 2011 11:15:00 -0600
Mario Guerra <mguerra(a)nic.cr> wrote:
Hello:
I'm informing that we, as of August 26th., have implemented FRED completely, as a
backend for our DNS administration.
I have a question, though about a domain, corobicicp.co.cr. Let's see first the FRED
information:
NIC-REG1(a)127.0.0.1> info_domain corobicicp.co.cr
Domain name: corobicicp.co.cr
Repository object ID: D0000030043-EPP
Created by: NIC-REG1
Designated registrar: NIC-REG1
Created on: 2007-10-10T18:00:00-06:00
Expiration date: 2011-10-10 <------- it has not expired
NSSET ID: COROBICICP_CO_CR <-------------------
Password for transfer: bfjZP1C6
Status: ok - Objekt is without restrictions
Registrant ID: CESAR.SALAS_AT_COROBICICP.CO.CR
Administrative contact: CESAR.SALAS_AT_COROBICICP.CO.CR
NIC-REG1(a)127.0.0.1> info_nsset COROBICICP_CO_CR
NSSET ID: COROBICICP_CO_CR
Repository object ID: N0000017473-EPP
Created by: NIC-REG1
Designated registrar: NIC-REG1
Created on: 2011-06-03T12:38:40-06:00
Password for transfer: CdrNZl0g
Status: linked - Has relation to other records in registry
Technical contact: NATALIA.ALVARADO_AT_COROBICICP.CO.CR
Name servers: corobicicp.co.cr, (200.122.149.206) <---------------------
secundario.nic.cr, (75.125.255.162) <---------------------
Report level: 3
Now let see what the corresponding zone files generate:
root@fred:/tmp# grep corobicicp db*
db..co.cr:corobicicp.co.cr. IN NS corobicicp.co.cr.
db..co.cr:corobicicp.co.cr. IN NS secundario.nic.cr.
As you can see, no A record for the corobicicp.co.cr domain is generated in despite it is
included in the nsset associated with the domain. I'm, though, including what thois
client's DNS server gives us:
root@fred:/tmp# dig +norec corobicicp.co.cr ns @200.122.149.206
; <<>> DiG 9.7.0-P1 <<>> +norec corobicicp.co.cr ns
@200.122.149.206
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 41890
;; flags: qr aa; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;corobicicp.co.cr. IN NS
;; ANSWER SECTION:
corobicicp.co.cr. 3600 IN NS dns.corobicicp.co.cr. <-------------
;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
dns.corobicicp.co.cr. 3600 IN A 200.122.149.206
I wonder if this inconssitency have a role for what is generated by genzone_client.
Best regards.
--
Mario Guerra <mguerra(a)nic.cr>
Well, there is a possible bug in genzone_client or such. If you have a server name which
is the same that the domain (say, both are guerra.co.cr). The name is generated BUT NOT
the correponding A record. In the above case corobicipc.co.cr does NOT generate an A
record, but if I include dns.corobicicp.co.cr with the same A record, both are generated
in the DNS tables.
Best regards.
--
Mario Guerra <mguerra(a)nic.cr>