Greetings!
Unfortunately we use our own objects and custom deviations from the EPP
RFCs. What do we need to change to provide their support?
Thank you!
15.11.2012 21:48, Jaromir Talir пишет:
Hi,
most precious would be diff to RFC versions :) What i have in mind is:
- nsset object - collection of nameserver hosts associated with domains
instead of individual hosts. Advantage for hosting providers having one
set of nameservers for thousands of domains - adding/change in ns is
just one command
- keyset object - similar to nsset, DNSKEY material is collected in
keyset and linked to domains instead of DS hashes within each domain.
- small changes in contact object - just one address, addition of
identification field (id card, passport,...), some other verification
states.
- transfer cannot be disapproved by old registrar - not really change
but waiting period for old registrar is 0.
Regards,
Jaromir
On Tue, 2012-11-13 at 16:27 +0400, Dmitry Belyavsky wrote:
> Greetings!
>
> Is there any howto for providing the registry-specific EPP extensions
> support for the FRED installation?
>
> Thank you!
>
> 08.11.2012 17:52, Jaromir Talir пишет:
>> Hi Dimitry,
>> for this type of installation you can type there anything, it should let
>> you go :)
>>
>> I'm looking forward for your feedback. One of the most actual
>> presentations covering all FRED aspects is here
>>
http://fred.nic.cz/attachment/wiki/documentation/FRED-20120624-JT-Workshop.…
>>
>> I recall that I promised at RIPE meeting to prepare recent livecd but
>> yet I haven't found a time to do that :( But if you managed to install
>> it on Fedora, it's not an obstacle..
>>
>> Regards,
>> Jaromir
>>
>> On Thu, 2012-11-08 at 17:31 +0400, Dmitry Belyavsky wrote:
>>> Greetings!
>>>
>>> I've installed FRED on Fedora 17 according to
>>>
http://fred.nic.cz/wiki/download
>>> Now I can't obtain the admin interface. Where can the credentials for
>>> demo access be found?
>>>
>>> Thank you!
>>>
>