Mario Guerra píše v Út 24. 02. 2009 v 15:03 -0600:
I've noticed that the nssets and keysets are
extensions to the regular
EPP descriptions in the RFCs.
I have a question: would those extensions be a problem if a registrar
expects the hosts and domains based on that?. I ask this because the
client development the NIC-CR (Costa Rica) made was based on the hosts
and domains transactions described in the RFCs.
Its a pity, but if registrar has RFC compliant EPP client, he can create
just domains without dns hosts. You need our client or client compatible
with our schema to use all features of fred. I'm thinking about some
improvements in this way but there is no plan right now.
Regards,
Jaromir
Let me say, Jaromir that I do like your EPP implemetation. The advantage
I like most is this:
You can use a nsset handle to create multiple domains that use that
handle. I think we are going to adapt our development to that, some work
must be made from our part.
Regards.
Mario