13 Bře
2018
13 Bře
'18
16:26
On 13 Mar 2018 at 13:45, Jiri Sadek wrote:
Hello,
it depends on a particular FRED version. I think, off the top of my
head, since FRED 2.28.0 dns hostnames in nsset are checked only if they
are rfc1123 compliant (labels min/max length, fqdn min/max length,
allowed characters a-z, A-Z, 0-9, - and . (dot))
Much better, hopefully we will benefit from this when we upgrade to 2.35 in the next few
weeks
Former FRED versions used to use also `enum_tlds`
database table to
check top level domain label. Content of this table needs to be manually
updated for example from http://data.iana.org/TLD/tlds-alpha-by-domain.txt.
Thanks for the clarification.
Regards,
Paulos
======================
Dr Paulos B Nyirenda
NIC.MW & .mw ccTLD
http://www.registrar.mw
Regards,
Jiri
On 03/12/2018 08:33 AM, Dr P Nyirenda wrote:
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
.
Is there a recommended new gTLD list recommended to be inserted into the FRED registry
TLD database table?
We at the .mw registry are now receiving regular requests for new gTLDs to be included
into
the FRED registry especially for DNS servers for nssets. The latest of these is .ruhr.
We would hence like to find out if there is a list of new gTLDs that we can insert in the
FRED
registry data base to take care of these requests instead of having to do this on request
when
a registrar fails to include a DNS server into an nsset.
How are the other FRED registry platform users handling this ?
Regards,
Paulos
======================
Dr Paulos B Nyirenda
NIC.MW & .mw ccTLD
http://www.registrar.mw
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com
_______________________________________________
fred-users mailing list
fred-users(a)lists.nic.cz
https://lists.nic.cz/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fred-users